Docker: sustained container load is thermally untested #68
Labels
No labels
blocked-physical
cleanup
hardware
infra
kernel
P1-critical
P2-high
P3-normal
P4-later
reliability
security
upstream
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
tiagoagueda/a80#68
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Split out of the Docker enablement work.
Every load this board has carried so far has been an interactive session or a bounded
soak that someone was watching. Containers are the first thing that will run it hard,
unattended, indefinitely.
What is known
pressure, and no governor to observe
What is not known
What four cores at 100 % for hours does to die temperature, and whether anything
throttles or resets before that.
The 4 GiB work (
57-4gb-reclaimed.md) established a decent methodology for this shapeof question - sustained load, fixed duration, check
dmesgfor hardware errorsafterwards - and it applies directly.
Done when
A multi-hour CPU soak has been run with thermal-zone logging, and peak temperature plus
any throttling events are recorded. If it turns out fine, that is a one-line answer
worth having before something important is hosted here.